- our common position in the Hague ...
TPSIPOL FORUM: NETWORK DEMOCRATIC
January 2008 interview
our common position in the Hague
FROM CHILE Http://groups.yahoo.com/group/eleccion/message/24414
The citizenry must be kept informed
05/01/2008
(RED) Ref
What development?
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/eleccion/message/20276
Primera Plana
04/01/2008
Our argument in The Hague 200 miles
prevent Chile achieved
the Court declared incompetent and have to keep the public informed
says
Ambassador Oswaldo de Rivero. ----------------------------------------------
------------
Veteran diplomat
dedicated to high consultancy work in Geneva, Switzerland, Ambassador Oswaldo de Rivero loses contact with Peru and is alert to
key issues of our foreign policy, as the crucial maritime boundary dispute with Chile, the speaker in this interview.
Does Allan Wagner is the ideal person for this topic?
, Ambassador Wagner is an experienced diplomat. I see that the Diplomatic Agent has been appointed to the Court in The Hague. However, this function does not exist
in the Statute or the procedures of this court. There are only agents, dry, without the addition of "diplomat."
Agent, period, I is the litigant, a highly specialized lawyer in the matter of trial and, especially, in the proceedings of the Court. So
not know if Wagner is going to have that role as Agent (trial) or the Diplomat Agent work is another. I think that before filing the lawsuit is necessary to clarify this issue. Marisol ambassadors Aguiero Colunga, José Chávez Soto and Jean Devis Chauny would work with Wagner.
"The appointees are competent. However, countries litigating at The Hague have older equipment. About 3 or 4 foreign jurists specialized in the substance of the trial and also in the procedures of the Court, and as advisers and lawyers about 4 or 5 national lawyers with prestige and experience as litigators and academics on law of the sea and especially maritime delimitation. Ambassador Manuel Rodriguez has just introduced the only book that focuses on what should be the position of Peru. I know he is
good relations with the government, but it is a State issue and a trial that will last longer than the period of this Government. Should convene.
What should be exposed as a fundamental?
"The fundamental issue is that Peru can not lack of 200 miles and Chile have them, when both countries since 1947, defended and propagated along the 200-mile view and succeeded was accepted in the current maritime law. Both countries must be 200 miles and that is possible.
What should be the strategy of our country?
"First we must prepare very well to prevent Chile achieved the Court has no jurisdiction or inadmissible Peruvian demand. Second, entering into the substance always invoke equity to achieve a maritime delimitation Peru that gives the 200 miles that are between Arequipa and Tacna. Third, to stop the domination of Chile on what that country calls, without any legal basis, its Sea Face, an offshore area which prevents the exercise Peru 200 miles. Fourth, that the maritime boundary begins on the shore
the sea.
Roberto MacLean said the suit is well prepared.
"I have not seen the lawsuit. But I think he has very good reason. I repeat: this is a sensitive, specialized, it is not easy. It must listen to many legal and political opinions. Should be informed citizens. It is a state matter, not government. `
Embj. Manuel Rodriguez in the OAS
GOOD TRANSLATION "legal mechanisms in trials at the Hague International Court of approaches are mainly written, called, or anti-Memoirs Memoirs and other writings. There are also oral arguments where the agent must know how to respond to questions asked by the judges and experts. The language at issue in the Court are French and English, to make some management out of those languages \u200b\u200bshould make an exception to the Court. We must take this really seriously, because a bad defense or a bad translation can be very expensive ..
How long will this process take between Peru and Chile?
-The Hague trials are long. Only the issue of whether the Court is competent or can not take 3 years and the trial itself
about 5 years or more.
0 comments:
Post a Comment